High anxiety the day before Election a
day. The S.F. Chronicle says turnout
will be low, lower than ever even. And that Republicans vote in higher numbers
traditionally in primaries. This is disheartening, as it may well mean my
candidate has less of a chance than I would have wanted, much less. If the Reps vote as they will they get an
automatic 20+%. Maybe more and the big red postcard calling them to arms, will
boost their vote even more,
Dems will naturally split the vote
against the incumbent and voila, here in a solidly Democratic District, the Rep
comes out on top (or on the top of the second place). The so called "moderate" Dem wins
easily in the fall.
Is this what top two voting is all
about the outcome hoped for? Instead of a vigorous intra-party race in the
primary for the best Democrat to go head to head with the Rep, it's all up for
grabs as once, and the best Democrat may well be left in the dust,
.
I suppose that is what many wanted when
they voted for top two, and open voting at that. The Moderate Dem faces the weak Rep. The
election is over in the primary, which it may have been anyway in a strong Dem District, but
it may have been more exciting, more issue driven, and a better Dem may have
won. Traditionally the stronger candidate with more progressive values wins in
the primary, while the one with the more conservative views wins in the
Republican primary. That’s why Tea Party candidates often win
primaries, then g on to tank in the General. Or not, of course, depending on
the geography and demographics of the District.
Bah humbug. This all leads to inaction
all around in the legislature. Good bills stalled as the moderate Dems kowtow
to their corporate masters. Who loses?
Poor people, the environment, kids in school, minorities, older people, the
disabled, the disenfranchised.
It's the age of gilt and steam and back
room deals all over again. Is this what voters really wanted when they voted in
the top two? What were they thinking?
may be the question to ask, if you thought there might be an answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment