Campaign Tip of the Day: You're on Stage all the Time; dress the part

Amid all the turmoil of government shutdown, allegations of sleaze from all quarters (Democrats not exempt), let's focus on the more mundane. You want to win that down ticket race? You want people to think you are professional and competent? Don't be seen in dirty jeans and untucked shirts, even if stepping out for a quart of milk while you're in heavy preparation for the big debate.

Even if you're coming home from your morning gym workout and just wanted to stop off for a cup of Joe at Starbucks.

Someone will see you. Someone will recognize you and say "wow is she a mess!"  Word will get around.

Take ten minutes and change, comb your hair and tuck in your shirt. Yes, even if you're getting the morning paper from the end of the driveway, at least wear shoes, not bunny slippers and a jacket, not your ratty old terry cloth robe. Spies are everywhere.

You are what you look like - NOT

This blog post appeared http://www.progresswomen.com/2013/04/10/a-womans-appearance-is-not-a-measure-of-her-credibility-get-it/ and I'm sure they won't mind if we print it here. 

A Woman’s Appearance is NOT a Measure of Her Credibility – Get it?

April 10, 2013 , by State Rep. Stacey Newman THANKS TO MSPRESENTATION FOR THIS.  AND YES, IT DOES HURT US WOMEN WHEN WE RUN FOR OFFICE.  JUST TALK ABOUT OUR QUALIFICATIONS AND OUR EXPERTISE, OK?  AND…OH YES, WHAT WE’RE WEARING IS NOT IMPORTANT EITHER.

courtesy of triblocal.com

In the wake of President Barack Obama apologizing to California Attorney General Kamala Harris for complimenting her on her good looks comes this blockbuster finding from a new study: when it comes to a female candidate, any media coverage about her appearance–even positive–hurts her with voters.By Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun Times

That’s a key conclusion of the poll for the Women’s Media Center and She Should Run, to be released Monday in Chicago at the Council on Foundations annual conference at the Hilton Chicago, 720 S. Michigan.

The survey’s release is timely because Obama’s remark about Harris is the latest in the long-running struggle of women seeking public office, not to have their looks influence how people assess their credibility.

Obama apologized Friday for saying, during a Thursday fund-raiser for the Democratic National Committee near San Francisco  that Harris is “brilliant,” “dedicated” and “tough.”  What Obama said after that is what got him in trouble: “She also happens to be, by far, the best-looking attorney general.”

The “Name It. Change It” survey, conducted by Celinda Lake of Lake Research and Robert Carpenter of Chesapeake Beach Consulting found that when any media coverage focuses on a female contender’s appearance–positive, negative, or neutral–”it made voters less likely to vote for her.”
Lake said, “Women candidates pay a real price when they are covered in a way that focuses on their appearance. “Even what we thought was benign coverage about how a woman dresses has a negative impact on her vote and whether voters perceive her as in touch, likeable, confident, effective, and qualified.  And, in close races, sexist coverage on top of the attacks that every candidate faces can make the difference between winning and losing.”

Harris through her spokesman shrugged off the Obama comment, an option an incumbent and Obama loyalist–not in an election battle–can easily take.

“When a woman candidate’s looks become part of the election story, she loses ground,” said Julie Burton, President of the Women’s Media Center.

The on-line survey was conducted March 3-7 of 1,500 likely voters, with an oversample of women between the ages of 18-35.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2013/04/blockbuster_female_candidates_.html