Wednesday, April 10, 2013

You are what you look like - NOT

This blog post appeared http://www.progresswomen.com/2013/04/10/a-womans-appearance-is-not-a-measure-of-her-credibility-get-it/ and I'm sure they won't mind if we print it here. 

A Woman’s Appearance is NOT a Measure of Her Credibility – Get it?

April 10, 2013 , by State Rep. Stacey Newman THANKS TO MSPRESENTATION FOR THIS.  AND YES, IT DOES HURT US WOMEN WHEN WE RUN FOR OFFICE.  JUST TALK ABOUT OUR QUALIFICATIONS AND OUR EXPERTISE, OK?  AND…OH YES, WHAT WE’RE WEARING IS NOT IMPORTANT EITHER.
courtesy of triblocal.com
courtesy of triblocal.com
In the wake of President Barack Obama apologizing to California Attorney General Kamala Harris for complimenting her on her good looks comes this blockbuster finding from a new study: when it comes to a female candidate, any media coverage about her appearance–even positive–hurts her with voters.By Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun Times

That’s a key conclusion of the poll for the Women’s Media Center and She Should Run, to be released Monday in Chicago at the Council on Foundations annual conference at the Hilton Chicago, 720 S. Michigan.

The survey’s release is timely because Obama’s remark about Harris is the latest in the long-running struggle of women seeking public office, not to have their looks influence how people assess their credibility.

Obama apologized Friday for saying, during a Thursday fund-raiser for the Democratic National Committee near San Francisco  that Harris is “brilliant,” “dedicated” and “tough.”  What Obama said after that is what got him in trouble: “She also happens to be, by far, the best-looking attorney general.”

The “Name It. Change It” survey, conducted by Celinda Lake of Lake Research and Robert Carpenter of Chesapeake Beach Consulting found that when any media coverage focuses on a female contender’s appearance–positive, negative, or neutral–”it made voters less likely to vote for her.”
Lake said, “Women candidates pay a real price when they are covered in a way that focuses on their appearance. “Even what we thought was benign coverage about how a woman dresses has a negative impact on her vote and whether voters perceive her as in touch, likeable, confident, effective, and qualified.  And, in close races, sexist coverage on top of the attacks that every candidate faces can make the difference between winning and losing.”

Harris through her spokesman shrugged off the Obama comment, an option an incumbent and Obama loyalist–not in an election battle–can easily take.

“When a woman candidate’s looks become part of the election story, she loses ground,” said Julie Burton, President of the Women’s Media Center.

The on-line survey was conducted March 3-7 of 1,500 likely voters, with an oversample of women between the ages of 18-35.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2013/04/blockbuster_female_candidates_.html

Thursday, April 4, 2013

How to Talk about Something you know Nothing (or Little) About

(For Jacquelyn Moritz, 1923-2013)

So, there I was, on my way to an Emerge training in Walnut Creek, California, to speak on Direct Mail Fundraising to a group of eager female students learning how to run for office. All good Democrats. All spending good money for this course.

Now, Emerge is one of my favorite training programs.  It takes a limited number of students each year in a 7 month intensive weekend training program that introduces them to the world of politics, campaigning, fundraising, and everything else associated with running, and winning, an elected office.  They meet top-notch campaign consultants, polling gurus, elected officials and other professionals who provide valuable lessons in what is really a crash course in the rough and tumble political game.

The last two years I spoke on Negative Campaigning  - the good, the bad and the truly ugly, when there is place for it, how to do it in a classy way and how to react if it's done to you.

This year they said no negative campaign talk, just how to raise money through the mails.  I said yes, naturally, although this is not my strong suit. No fundraising is. I know the fundamentals, I give them to my clients and I say go out there and ask, ask ask.  But give a talk on it on the same ticket as some of the best in this field, yikes!

I realize I was only asked at the last minute because someone else, and better at the topic, dropped out.

Also, it was a hard time as my beloved mother in law, Jackie, who I had spent a lot of time with over the past few years, had suffered a fall and a hip replacement the previous week, but never recovered, and that morning at 2:25 she had died in her sleep.  I had been up since then, and if I had not promised to fill in on short notice, would have backed out of the talk myself.

So there I was navigating the twisted route along the 80 freeway maze to Route 24 to Walnut Creek. At least it wasn't raining. I timed it so I got some yummy pasta and salad to fortify me, as they were just finishing the lunch break, then to hear Shari Rubin, a real fundraiser give her talk.  She's perky and young, making me feel old and tired.  We exchange cards and I am up.  My talk is basic, write those letters. Snail mail still works, but keep them short. One page is best. Target them. Ask for the money you need.  Tell people what it's for. Follow up.

Follow up. The most important part of any campaign, the follow up, whether with fundraising or persuading the voters. They must hear from you over again. They must be addressed personally and often.  In fundraising, until they run screaming from the room shouting a loud "NOOOOOO!!" as they go.

Keep good lists, cull the ones who are repeatedly unresponsive; change addresses, so simple, so easily overlooked.

Ask and ask again; once they've made an investment in your campaign, they will want to see it pay off, with you in office.  And remember you are not asking for money for yourself, but your campaign, and the causes you champion that your donors and supporters believe in.  You win, they win.

Mercifully my talk was short without too many questions. Merciful for me, for the students. "First time that's happened," says Kimberly the enthusiastic Executive Director of Emerge California. "We're ahead of time."

Of course that's only because I didn't have all that much to say. And I'm not perky, young, cute or an expert in this particular field. I do sometimes surprise myself though, knowing more than I thought I did. So I wasn't unmitigatedly awful.

I say goodbye, drive home and attend a family gathering in my mother in law's assisted living room. Wine, snacks, stories and home to bed early. A very surreal day, sad and uplifting all at once.


As a good Democrat and active member of her community well into her eighties, I don't think Jackie would have had it any other way.
                                                   Jackie in her kitchen in Pt. Reyes 2010.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

When Women Run…..Women Win!



So here is the good news, when women do run, they win.  But with these things in mind. We've seen it all, and we know what works.  Check it out and leave your comments.



Women in Office Today:



Is there a difference between the way a woman runs and the way a man runs for public office?



The answer is yes, no and it depends.



This is an evolving issue.  After the Year of the Woman, 1992, when record numbers of women were elected to Congress, there has been steady progress in the numbers of women elected to local, State and Federal offices.



But we are still not at parity.



In 1971 women constituted 4.5 percent of state legislators. Today (as of March 2013), they are 24.1 percent nationwide.  Of the 100 largest American cites, just 12 have women mayors.



5 out of 50 Governors are women (down from 8 in 2008), and 10 are Lieutenant Governors (no change).  In Congress, women hold 97 House seats and 20 out a 100 Senate seats. (http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf) This is an improvement over 2008, when the first version of this article ran, but it is not enough. Not by a long shot.



Remember, women make up 51% of the total population of this country.



Special Pitfalls for the Woman Candidate?



The rise of women was more dramatic in the early years (post 1992) and has tapered off. Is this because women are no longer seen as a novelty? Or because they are not running in as great a number as their male counterparts?



Probably both.  What the literature on the subject shows is that there are very few differences in the way women run for office than the way men do.  It may have been that at one time women tended to run more positive campaigns, be seen as more compassionate and interested in “women’s issues” (childcare, health care, gun control and health care access)  But these are issues that break down more along Party lines and geographic differences than gender.



However, that does not mean there are not special pitfalls for the female politician.  There’s an old adage about the heyday of the big budget musical: don't forget that Ginger Rogers did everything he did, backwards... and in high heels." 



Women running today might heed that admonition.  A woman still has to work a little bit harder for those votes. The stereotypes, although not so obvious, are still in play. 



Here are some tips for the female candidate from the seemingly trivial to the seriously trenchant.



Ten Tips for the Female Candidate:



  1. Grooming.  OK, let’s get it out of the way. All candidates need to pay attention to their personal image.  Men with frayed shirts and food on their tie are no more appealing than women whose lipstick is smeared or hose is unraveling.


Women still get judged more harshly on their appearance than do men.  A real headline in the New York Sun read:  Stylists Interpret Messages of Senator Clinton's Accoutrements in the most recent Presidential primary.  (Jan 25, 2007 New York Sun)



With that said, here are a very few grooming I’ve amassed “on the trail” that  can help you make a good first impression on voters, the press and your potential donors:  Keep your hair fairly short or if you really can’t live without it above the shoulder, pin it up for formal portraits or campaign events.  Pant suits are fine (ala Hillary) and calf length skirts work well. Skip the stilettos, and if you tend to be generously endowed, dress to minimize the cleavage.   You want the voters and the pundits to remember the words that come out of your mouth not what spills out of your blouse. As for make up, subtle is fine.  



  1. The other extreme. Because women often feel they must be tough to make it through a campaign and be taken seriously, they sometimes go to the other extreme.  Severe haircuts, button shirts and rigid posture.  They won’t crack a smile for fear of seeming frivolous or seeming to trivialize important issues.  Men can come off as arrogant or posturing and people tend to forgive them as long as they like their message, but women do have to walk a finer line. 


So, be yourself, maintain your sense of humor and humanity while showing your firm grasp of the issues and willingness to tackle problems with both hands


3.   Issues. Don’t go out of your way to look for “women’s issues,” but don’t shy away from them either.    You may find that your primary issue, while important, is not the main one your constituents are talking about. Don’t be afraid to switch gears when need be. In a recent local representative seat race, the female candidate, a nurse practitioner, was focused like a laser on single payer health care; that was her passion and that got her into the race. But the main issue turned out to be protecting a large tract of open space land and wetlands. Her slogan “for our health, community and quality of life,” fit this new issue perfectly and allowed her to run with it while keeping access to health care on her list of top bullet points leading to a win and a second term without challengers.


4.   Going negative. It’s still true that women are more reluctant than men to “go negative,” that is until their opponent does it first.   A popular city council candidate feared being perceived as a word that rhymes with witch if she went after her opponent. That is until he attacked her for a minor inconsistency in her material. Then off came the gloves;  his background working for developers was unmasked and she sailed to victory.  It’s not negative if it’s true, relevant and fully documented.

  1. When women run against women.  Increasingly, the races are between two women.  This new trend makes for interesting campaigns.  Women can still be “good ol’ boys” and when you are the underdog, a newcomer or a progressive taking on the system, you need to be prepared to point that out.   If your opponent is someone you personally like,  and it is just on some key issues that you differ (and you probably wouldn’t be in the race, if these issues were not very important to you), remember, a campaign is not personal. You can point out the reasons voters should vote for you and not her, without turning into a pit bull.


You may not enjoy best friendship status once the campaign is over, but if you feel strongly about the issues, you need to make your best case to the voter, despite who the opponent is.



  1. Your opponent is the “good ol’ boy.”  He’s taking you to task for inexperience, seizing on trivial inconsistencies or gaps in your resume. Don’t be afraid to point pout how you juggled home, family and your ambitious husband for those missing years, and all that volunteer work you’ve done? Tout it.  Then use your best advisors to craft a message that shows you know policy and can deliver as well or better than the man.


First time women candidates do face tougher challenges, because of their perceived lack of experience and need to be prepared to raise sufficient funding to offset it, to point out the negatives of their more experienced opponent and to keep emphasizing the experience they do have, whether political or not.  Even taking on entrenched incumbents can be done with the right set of tools.



While reluctant at first to “go negative” a first time Supervisorial candidate taking on a long time male incumbent, finally took the gloves off when she learned her opponent was treating his public office like campaign central, in violation of the law.  She vowed to “let the sun shine” on local government and won in a landslide.



Another neophyte candidate went after her opponent’s do-nothing tenure in office and squeaked out a narrow win, but a victory all the same, in a local special district race.



  1. Raising money.  This is something I have found women are reluctant to do. It’s an ego thing.  That is, they often feel it is egotistical to ask for money for their own campaign. (Ironically, women make tremendous fundraisers for non-profit causes and even other candidates).  They are running out a deep sense of altruism and wanting to make the world a better place for future generations.  This is why groups like Emily’s List have popped up.  Women often need some extra prodding, and training, to start raising the necessary funds to get elected.  Remember if you can’t raise enough money to get your message to the voters, the best intentions won’t help you on election day.


  1. You’re the boss.  I have found that women candidates hate to say no.  When spouses, relatives and their hair stylist tell them what their message ought to be, they listen. And of course they should. But they also need to listen to their own conscience and the experienced advice of their campaign consultant.  Men also have this problem, but they tend to pick out one or two self-described “experts” and demand their consultants take the advice offered. 


In my experience, the biggest losers have been those who ignored their consultant’s advice  and went instead with Aunt Sally or George the engineer in their husband’s firm. They lost their elections and some of them lost a lot of money too. Ultimately you are the boss, and your desire not to hurt your friends’ and families’ feelings by ignoring their advice could cost you the election.  Always thank them for their insight and run it by your consultant before gently telling them your thick headed consultant wouldn’t listen to their pearls of wisdom.



  1. “When women run, women win.”  (Slogan variously attributed to Emily’s List, National Women’s Political Caucus and Yale Women’s Campaigns school among others) Things have changed over the years.  Many of the misconceptions about women’s chances at winning politics office are just that: misconceptions. Once true, perhaps, but as we see more women professionals generally, we will continue to see more women politicians. The sad thing is many women themselves have bought into these misconceptions, making the decision to run a more grueling one than it needs to be. 


Many women still believe they don’t stand a chance against seasoned male counterparts.  Studies have shown when women run, they do as well, if not better, than the men. They can raise as much money, they can get the same share of the vote, and the bias toward them as women is not nearly so pronounced as it was once. (Women Candidates in American Politics: What We Know, What We Want to Know, Kathleen Dolan, Department of Political Science,  University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, presented at the 2006 Midwest Political Science Association, meeting)  Reviewing my own won-lost record over the past ten years, I see that of my women candidates three fourths won their races, while just slightly more than half of the men did.



But perceptions can paralyze the would-be candidate.   When women run, they win; the trouble is they don’t run often enough.


10.  Your special positives as a woman. Stereotypes can help the woman candidate, in being seen as more compassionate, honest, even “liberal” in a time of corruption and lack of confidence in government generally.  A Democratic woman taking on a Republican man has several built in advantages, if she knows how to use them.  Again, raising money, not being afraid of “going negative” and emphasizing your real life experience, can all help a new comer to local politics.


Women candidates and elected officials will make up more and more of the American political landscape in the future.  This is a good thing.  If you’ve been concerned about some of the issues raised in this article,  I hope you will now feel more comfortable about running.  Your chances are just as good as the next guy’s.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Running to Win - Why Women Candidates Need to get out of the Spike Heels

Other than smashing in an opponent's temple, there's no place for high heels on the campaign trail.  Oh, yes, you sexy candidates can sport them to high end campaign events and the places you go to be seen. But to be taken seriously as a candidate, leave the heels behind, lace up your running shoes and hit the ground at a fast clip.  Even if this is just metaphor, be ready for action at all times.  Learn martial arts, and wear a helmet, but an invisible one. Your head needs to stay clear and you will be taking a lot of blows.

Protect your crotch. believe me, the blows can be low. The fight can be dirty. Learn all the tricks of the trade, and never stop smiling through the pain.

Those are some of the timely tips for the female candidate.  There are more.

Once you are suited up and ready to roll, we'll get into those.

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Negative Campaigning

Nobody likes negative campaigning. Nobody. Except it works.  Even as people complain loudly about trash in their inbox and mailbox and on TV, it sinks in.

But it has to be done fairly. No low blows, no personal assaults, no lies.  And don't use stupid images that have nothing to do with your race, your candidate, the issues or the opponent. 

If you're running against an incumbent, negative messages are almost di rigeur. You are seeking a job currently held by someone else. That is you have to tell employer (the voters) why they should fire the incumbent and hire you. If people don't think he/she is doing a bad job, or just doing an adequate job or overlooking something important, they will look at you more seriously as a contender.

If there is actual corruption, malfeasance or hypocrisy, even better, for the negative campaign! But don't go all righteous and pompous. Use humor. Best way to get the message across, as you pump up your own clinet's positives.

I personally think women are much better at the light tough - the right touch - in the negative campaign.  Men can get all heavy handed and blown up with their own swagger and overdue the nasties, while not building up their candidate enough in the public eyes. 

To sum up:

  • Negative campaigning works when it is the right time, the right, light, touch, truthful, well-documented and not over the top
  • Always use separate mail/media to build up your own candidates preferably by showing  him/her interacting with locals, caring about local issues, being in touch
  • More paper in the mail does not necessarily equate to more votes. Smart campaigning and balance is much more likely to carry the day.






Saturday, March 16, 2013

Saying bah-bye to a client

What to do when a client fires you?  It's devastating at first. After you've bent over backwards, dealing with the client's endless second guessing of every idea, design and recommendation for fundraising, the client decides you are not working fast enough, paying him enough attention, taking him seriously, raising enough money, or just plain not eager enough about his campaign, and calls it quits.

Never mind that you explained endlessly websites don't come out of the blue; he has to supply at least the draft of content and must be responsive to your comments.  He's the client and he knows best. This is especially egregious with clients who've run before whether they've won or lost. They just know it all, and you are there to follow out their predetermined plan.

What do you mean, you need a new set of photos of the client interacting with locals, in various locations and situations? His mom's/wife's/brother's photos from last year's barbecue are great, and what about the one of him beaming next to the Governor, the one where the governor is gazing off in the distance, and the client wears a goofy smile, and looks downright sycophantic?

He calls, says I'm very sorry, but I need someone who can get the job done the right way. I don't know why you can't do it. You have a good reputation, so maybe it's me (but he doesn't mean it).

OK, you say, having decided this campaign cannot be salvaged. We'll call it even and keep our good relationship intact.  Perhaps you were friends before all this. It happens.  Smile and take it.  Just hope he doesn't ask for his retainer back.  And remember you have done a good job for him, one that a new team can step into and maybe salvage the race. Or not.

You wait with trepidation to see what he will do and how he will spin this falling out.  Spin first.  Like a divorcing couple, you just had irreconcilable differences, but you are still friends and wish him the best, as you scout out the next client, vowing to do a better job of vetting this time.

Monday, March 4, 2013

Reality TV

Campaigning is like Reality TV. The best and the worst.  So why not have a reality TV show that is a real life campaign?  Two candidates vie for a real position. I wonder if you can have them win by audience vote? Wouldn't that be awesome, but probably unconstitutional. Fun though.

You could have taping of a two real campaigns, with their strategy, their precinct walking, their agonizing over mail, TV spots, arguments arguments between candidates who think they (or their second cousin the ad agency hotshot from Peoria) knows better than the consultant they are paying good money for.

Plus all the real life fun of last minute hit pieces, Twitter indiscretions,  ugly divorces and other juicy scandals.

Yeah, baby, let's do it!